Short-termism.

30  12  25

I’ve long admired Chris Packham. His recent conversation with Amol Rajan on RADICAL (A War on Climate Change: Are Environmental Activists Losing The Fight?) stayed with me — not because it revealed something new, but because of how clearly it spoke about responsibility.⁣⁣

What he’s describing isn’t ignorance.⁣

We know what’s happening.

⁣It’s the habit of delay. Of softened language. Of choosing the short term over what’s necessary.⁣⁣

Part of the problem, I think, is that the light is often very seductive — sometimes deliberately so. We’re reassured, distracted, kept busy. And when the light is bright enough, it becomes easier not to look too closely at what sits beyond it.⁣⁣

Listening, I kept thinking about something I talk about often in another context: darkness.⁣⁣

Every meaningful act of creation starts there — uncertainty, not knowing, sitting with questions before rushing to answers. But increasingly, we avoid that space. We reach for speed, certainty, and reassurance instead.⁣⁣

That instinct shows up everywhere.

⁣⁣In education, depth gives way to pace. Tools replace thinking. Not because educators don’t care — most care deeply — but because the system leaves little room for doubt, silence, or exploration.

⁣⁣Brands mirror it too. Quick wins. Borrowed relevance. Activity mistaken for progress.⁣⁣

Technology accelerates all of this — friction removed, waiting eliminated, consequences deferred.⁣⁣

Chris makes a vital point: individual effort matters, but without structural change it isn’t enough. Responsibility has to be built into the system — otherwise the burden is endlessly shifted, diluted, postponed.

⁣⁣If we never slow down enough to face what’s actually happening, we drift — creatively, culturally, environmentally — toward a far deeper darkness than the one we’re trying to avoid.⁣⁣

Darkness isn’t the problem.

⁣Avoiding it is.⁣⁣

And the work — in every sense — is having the courage to stay there long enough to change course.

JM